<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" ><channel><title>Neil Cowburn &#187; Outdoors</title> <atom:link href="http://neilcowburn.com/category/outdoors/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://neilcowburn.com</link> <description></description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2011 12:11:35 +0000</lastBuildDate> <language>en</language> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com"/><atom:link rel="hub" href="http://superfeedr.com/hubbub"/> <item><title>Virtual Earth vs Google Maps</title><link>http://www.neilcowburn.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&#038;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&#038;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fneilcowburn.com%2F2008%2F01%2F27%2Fvirtual-earth-vs-google-maps%2F&#038;seed_title=Virtual+Earth+vs+Google+Maps&#038;utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=rss#utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=virtual-earth-vs-google-maps</link> <comments>http://www.neilcowburn.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&#038;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&#038;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fneilcowburn.com%2F2008%2F01%2F27%2Fvirtual-earth-vs-google-maps%2F&#038;seed_title=Virtual+Earth+vs+Google+Maps#comments</comments> <pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2008 23:52:01 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Neil</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Other]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Outdoors]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neilcowburn.com/blog/2008/01/27/virtual-earth-vs-google-maps/</guid> <description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m planning on using either Virtual Earth or Google Maps for a little Ruby on Rails project so I thought I&#8217;d compare how the satellite imaging weighed up from both service providers. You can see the results below. The images are at exactly the same location (53&#176; 5&apos; 47.4756&#34; N, 3&#176; 56&apos; 51.6294&#34; E; aka [...]]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m planning on using either Virtual Earth or Google Maps for a little Ruby on Rails project so I thought I&#8217;d compare how the satellite imaging weighed up from both service providers. You can see the results below. The images are at exactly the same location (53&deg; 5&apos; 47.4756&quot; N, 3&deg; 56&apos; 51.6294&quot; E; aka <i>RAC Boulders</i>).</p><p><p style="text-align: center;"><img src="http://www.neilcowburn.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/01/mappingcomparison.png" alt="Mapping Comparison" border="0" /></p><p>I find the Virtual Earth image to be a little too bleached, while the Google Maps image is not vibrant enough to give the same level of detail as the Virtual Earth image. Which do you prefer?</p></p> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.neilcowburn.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&#038;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&#038;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fneilcowburn.com%2F2008%2F01%2F27%2Fvirtual-earth-vs-google-maps%2F&#038;seed_title=Virtual+Earth+vs+Google+Maps/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>2</slash:comments> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 1/10 queries in 0.001 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 290/300 objects using disk: basic

Served from: neilcowburn.com @ 2012-02-08 21:39:10 -->
